The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
it has to do with a Sugar Act in 1934 expiring in the 1970s leading to Rising prices of sugar and manufacturers saying hey we can make high fructose corn syrup way cheaper than sugar and that allows us to have higher profit margins on our processed food products
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
when in doubt follow the money when it comes to food and human health so high fructose corn syrup is in Foods because it's cheaper than real sugar quote unquote