The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
I think that in general we do not have to fear coronavirus if we are taking care of ourselves and our families if we have people in our lives who are susceptible to coronavirus elderly frail infirm we should protect him and try to get them some good nutrition you guys and girls you all know you know what I believe to be the best source of nutrition it would be animal foods animal organs
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
I believe the conversation around coronavirus is missing this conversation I posted stuff on Instagram about diabetes how many people in ICUs had diabetes at one ICU it was an N of 1 or was an out of 15 but 14 of them had diabetes or prediabetes is crazy this is where I think the conversation should go