We can't find evidence that holds up here. Proponents are reasoning from mechanism or analogy rather than direct human data, and the most credible skeptics raise objections we can't dismiss.
if you adjust for um publication bias it doesn't look like there's much holding up there so often we're presented with evidence and we may want to come back to this when we talk about some other things things like especially protein intake we're presented with statements as though we confidently know these and yet when you really start to open the hood and peel things back you say hey there's not a lot of there there on the data so the data that nudge works is actually shaky
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.