The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
different people will have to do a greater amount of restriction that's just the way the cards crumble not everybody has the same IQ not everybody has the same athleticism not everybody has the same you know emotional intelligence and not everybody has the same metabolism so some people are going to have to be you know not very restrictive they just have to be somewhat mindful of what they eat and the cards fall into place
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.