The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
though in my book I give you no space for this thing called a carnivore ich die you know like you know mostly animal foods with a few plant foods perhaps with attention to a spectrum of plant toxicity and individual sort of sensitivities to various plants
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
at a very broad level I think of a carnivore diet as a diet that emphasizes animal foods that is a diet that focuses on animal foods and understands that the majority of our nutrients are coming from animal foods and consumes either no plant matter or plant matter with attention to a spectrum of plant toxicity
I describe to your one as carnal or ish which is what I'm talking about now get your nutrients from animal products think about plants on a spectrum of toxicity which are the most toxic plants which are the least toxic plants