The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
they measured overall weight they measured body mass index they measured maybe not specifically but they measured body fat they measure weight they mentioned blood pressure they measure kidney function things that would have gone south metaphorically if if a carnivore died had been bad and these people were in good health at the end of it
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
there was a very close follow of two people that came back from Alaska specifically vilem herself and Steffensen and anderson in 1930 that was known at Bellevue Hospital sometimes people poopoo that studies saying it was 1930 but they looked at kidney function they looked at weight they won't you know so we actually very useful