The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
and I guess for me that's probably okay but then I think about it for my wife or my female patient where it I mean it's like it's hard to get them up to 120 grams per day yeah we struggled with all of the adult women we had in our studies and you know we had whatever 3 400 uh it's a real struggle to keep a female at 100 grams of protein per day it's just a struggle uh and that then quality becomes an issue
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.