Direct evidence is thin. The claim is plausible and aligns with adjacent findings, but there isn't yet a body of high-quality work that would let us call it well-supported on its own terms.
the ones who who were on the very low carbohydrate diet were only there for a month and my feeling is we really should have gone longer i think we could have seen different results but but they're only there for a month a month is long enough for some people but not long enough for others and there's a good argument to make that you know it should be two months or even three months to really stabilize that metabolic change
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.