The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
it speaks to how difficult i think it is to study any of this stuff and and by the way was i perfectly controlling my exercise during that period of time no it's quite possible that some of those changes had to do with other variables
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
i think one of the challenges of studying ketogenic diets is the length of time it takes to adapt to them
i went on a ketogenic diet in may of 2011 as an experiment and i was committed to doing it for 12 weeks and uh i mean five weeks in i had i was so miserable my wife was like what are you doing and why and you know all the standard mistakes i was making and and the first being i made no reduction in training volume and i was already training at the level of a maniac right so i mean ridiculous training volume and i made zero reduction in it and i was i mean just staggeringly and upsettingly miserable and at 12 weeks i finally crested the first hill which was the aerobic hill so at the time it was cycling and swimming were the two sports and i at 12 weeks i just got to the point where i could get my aerobic base back to where it was 12 weeks earlier but anaerobically i was nowhere near what i was 12 weeks earlier