The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
so we use we have used quite a lot of uh carbon 13 or 13 carbon over the last years uh and we added that as a tracer to uh glucose and fructose for example to look at basically how or basically how much of exogenous carbohydrates or to to use some more common term how much of the carbohydrates that you you that you ingest that you're able to utilize
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.