The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
if you force cows if you allow cows to graze on plants and a pasture they will eat a little bit of this a little bit of that a little bit of this a little bit of that and they are smart enough to eat only enough of the plant that they don't become toxic right they eat a small amount and they move to something else
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
the herbivores do have evolutionary adaptations and these include a generalized diet that reduces the probability of eating a toxic amount of any one species number one i'll talk about that in a moment the ability to detect and avoid poisonous poisonous plants number two humans are horrible at that and the ability to detoxify plant poisons all appear to operate at least to a degree in both domestic and wild herbivores