The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
they can literally sense the fight on nutrient records and they literally reject foods that they know yeah I have over 30 different words to describe the phytochemical taste of foods
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
they can literally sense fight on nutrient foods and they literally reject foods that they know yeah I have over 30 different words to describe the phytochemical taste of foods
they have over 30 different words to describe the phytochemical taste of foods