The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
because so many chronic diseases happen over time a lot of people might think they're thriving now and maybe 20 years of poor eating which is often the case people who have all the chronic diseases have eaten that way for a long time so isn't there an argument that everybody ought to change their diet right away even if they think they're thriving right now
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.