The evidence is convergent. Multiple independent sources reach the same conclusion, the underlying mechanism is well-characterized, and even the field's most cautious voices treat it as worth doing.
i love it and i think that's kind of the magic number 80 to 100 i mean i've heard people say 90 grams like you should give your body 90 grams of carbs a day like that's but who knows it's probably somewhere in that range so you're gonna make it if you don't eat it and i think for some people getting rid of it is a good thing short term but long term i think the dogma gets in the way of a lot of people doing as well as they could so
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
so I do think on a normal distribution curve and I talk about in in the book somewhere between a hundred total grams of carbs a day and zero total grams of carbs a day that in my that's my current definition of the carbohydrate Spectrum for a proper human diet
how much should you have in your diet I think that the lower end for humans probably around 100 grams of carbohydrates a day I do not think that you as a human should go below 100 grams of carbohydrates that's everyone if you're obese if you're a pre-diabetic if you're diabetic having 100 grams of carbohydrates in your diet a day I think is the bottom end
I do not think that you as a human should go below 100 grams of carbohydrates that's everyone if you're obese if you're pre-diabetic if you're diabetic having a 100 grams of carbohydrates in your diet a day I think is the bottom end