The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
And then of course we have that whole other issue with with the APOB issue to do it in a way that doesn't really talk about everyone should follow this diet or this diet or this diet, but instead understand the pros, cons, how to think about diets and put it into their own life.
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
And then we're going to evaluate each diet through a framework, which is what are the core requirements for that diet to work? What are its strengths including who is it best suited for? Because oftentimes we've talked is sometimes there's going to be different diets that are better for different people. So what is that and why is that? And then we'll look at its weaknesses which is if someone's going to follow a diet, what are some of the pitfalls and how can they be addressed and how can they avoid those?