Paul Saladino· MD
you have to do things called like the ransom at method to look at how stable an oil is how oxidizable an oil is
The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
you have to do things called like the ransom at method to look at how stable an oil is how oxidizable an oil is
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
smoke point has to do with the amount of free fatty acids in an oil and it doesn't have to do with how stable that oil is to oxidation so don't be confused by smoke points smoke points basically tell you nothing about how oxidizable how stable an oil is