The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
And also, it helps you like the processed food thing, you know, with with this. I think as people became more educated with the dangers of refined sugars, for example, they didn't they they was focused on just this refined sugar. It's like this tunnel vision. Refined sugar is bad.
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
But yeah, I mean, once you like once you meet those those goals and those needs, [snorts] you're everything else is like easy. Like you don't have to worry about like you're not eating the refined sugar. Why? Because you don't need it. It's not part of the equation.