Paul Saladino· MD
Humans need to eat a "species-appropriate" diet and so do the animals that nourish us.
Verbal pushback — no audited source on record.
74
Loading…
The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
Humans need to eat a "species-appropriate" diet and so do the animals that nourish us.
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
you know species-appropriate diet is what you want here animals to be eating
and the what the animal is eating is so important and for the animal to have a species-appropriate diet is critical for us