Paul Saladino· MD
Now you are citing horrible observational research to suggest red meat is bad for humans.
Loading…
We can't find evidence that holds up here. Proponents are reasoning from mechanism or analogy rather than direct human data, and the most credible skeptics raise objections we can't dismiss.
Now you are citing horrible observational research to suggest red meat is bad for humans.
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
for him to say that meat is associated with any inflammation or anything harmful so his whole argument that cigarettes and meat aren't anyway the same or are using the same playbook I certainly is just pretty absurd and entirely premature
And this is the other kind of uh, you know, battle we have is that this concept that eating red meat is bad for your heart, is causing cancer, you know, all of this stuff. None of which again was ever true.