The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
if you've ever lost weight and then regained it why did it happen it didn't happen because you didn't get your macronutrient ratio perfect or your nutrient timing wasn't down it happened because you stopped being consistent with the behaviors that you implemented
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
if you've ever lost weight and then regained it why did it happen it didn't happen because you didn't get your macronutrient ratio perfect or your nutrient timing wasn't down it happened because you stopped being consistent with the behaviors that you implemented that's what happened
if you've ever lost weight and then regained it why did it happen it didn't happen because you didn't get your macronutrient ratio perfect or your nutrient timing wasn't down it happened because you stopped being consistent with the behaviors that you implemented that's what happened