The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
the other cost is in the externalities it's the cost of us not being able to produce food in the future it's the cost of getting cancer from the food that we're eating it's the cost of you know these communities collapsing and all this generational wealth declining and disintegrating and then bill gates buying that land right there's all these externalities where that cost is actually realized
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.