The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
part of my little mad scientist tinkering in the back lab is like well let's think about it what could we get sufficient in this do we see if clinically am i deficient in this no I'm not where am I getting this nutrient do the nutrient levels even apply to somebody on a carnivore diet
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
behind all of that is questions about well we develop nutritional deficiencies if we don't any plans should I be eating plants are there benefits of plants that were missing
So the only reservation I have there would be the same reservation with someone who eats vegetarian or only low FODMAP, which is it seems reasonable that having all the food groups in your diet would be a hedge against some type of unintended deficiency.