The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
they found significant positive trends for intake of nitrates nitrites from plants and unexpectedly for fruit and vegetable intake but not for red meat so what they're saying in this study which is kind of striking is that there was an association between brain cancer and nitrite intake from plant sources and fruit and vegetables
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
they found no significant trends in glioma this is brain cancer risk for a consumption of processed or red meat nitrate so that's no.3 - vitamin C or vitamin E