Paul Saladino· MD
there really are no leafy greens that i'm aware of eaten by any indigenous tribes in the african bush for anything other than medicinal purposes not for food purposes
Loading…
The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
there really are no leafy greens that i'm aware of eaten by any indigenous tribes in the african bush for anything other than medicinal purposes not for food purposes
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
what i realized and i when i did the research on this is that kale is not kale doesn't grow in africa as far as i can tell it was imported and i think the people that mary is talking about who eat kale as a shona are getting imported kale or are acculturated a little bit to western culture i do not think that the shona people eat kale in the african bush there really are no leafy greens that i'm aware of eaten by any indigenous tribes in the african bush for anything other than medicinal