The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
myself and Dan Moore worked on this uh when I first came to Canada using like positive and negative controls to try to you know look at lap one protein expression in human skeletal muscle and it certainly improved recently they've certainly improved the antibody I know that but at the time it was a bit of a nightmare to tease out so the the antibody for human muscle was very very difficult um to get working so I think it's certainly improved now
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.