The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
and if somebody says they didn't eat anything he's just kind of he doesn't even really say anything he just kind of like walks off but he's just kind it's it's almost like oh I guess you're not all in you know I guess you're not I guess you're not as into this as I thought because this is this is the method that we're going to use
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.