The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
the first one in 1997 was humans grouped according to the mns blood group system they gave them a low-fat diet and the outcome uh was quantitative measurements of the reduction in ldl cholesterol it doesn't really mean anything because it didn't really seem to support the hypothesis that it it was helpful
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.