We can't find evidence that holds up here. Proponents are reasoning from mechanism or analogy rather than direct human data, and the most credible skeptics raise objections we can't dismiss.
it's like they were trying to hack the system of how can I eat as much junk food as I want I'm allowed 3,000 calories a day what if it's all Skittles right so like what if I do just protein shake you know Skittles and peanut butter and and my point is like listen like if you take anything too far it's probably a really bad idea
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.