The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
Doesn't have to be perfect, right? You don't have to be using an aura ring and have every measure in the blue. Um, you don't have to be eating the most perfect diet, but at least go from the bad job most people are doing and upgrade to at least being in the vicinity of of healthy and then re-evaluate.
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.