The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
My thoughts on this have generally been that evolutionarily linoleic acid is probably a signal for us to get fat as it allows our adipocytes to expand and saturated fats especially steric acid are the opposite signal that can't tell our fat cells to shrink
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
it's not that monounsaturated fats are poisonous for humans my sense of this is that the issue here is that they're a signal yes and and the ratio or the relative contributions of our diets of AIC acid which is an 18 carbon monounsaturated fat versus steric acid and other saturated fat