The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
the reality is as you both acknowledge that we just don't know at this I mean it's it's very interesting to me to speculate but at the end of the day we don't know whether you know our consumption increasing our consumption of more vegetables and fruits that the Equator was essentially an adaptation to a change in the environment that was due to human activity you know basically over hunting the megafauna
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.