The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
how many plants did hunter-gatherer societies typically eat i mean it depends hundreds it depends on the it depends on the society yeah yeah but like hundreds and think about you'd walk around you'd find something you eat it like you'd be desperate like i don't know there's probably a lot here but if you have hundreds of different plants
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
almost anywhere you look in the world the number of species consumed is just vastly greater amongst hunter-gatherers than modern people i mean something like the average american eats like around 30 foods a 30 species a year but you know a hunter gatherer in the same area where i live mighty 200 species a year and might know how to eat three or four hundred if they needed to