Rhonda Patrick· PhD
likely driven by microbiome-disrupting emulsifiers, added sugars, and chronic low-grade inflammation.
Loading…
The evidence is convergent. Multiple independent sources reach the same conclusion, the underlying mechanism is well-characterized, and even the field's most cautious voices treat it as worth doing.
likely driven by microbiome-disrupting emulsifiers, added sugars, and chronic low-grade inflammation.
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
Beyond processed meats, diets high in ultra-processed foods as a whole, including packaged breads, sugary drinks, and ready-to-eat meals, carry an 11% higher colorectal cancer hazard overall, and a 29% higher risk in men, likely driven by microbiome-disrupting emulsifiers, added sugars, and chronic low-grade inflammation.
Colorectal cancer rates have surged since the 1930s, and it’s no coincidence Over the same decades, our diets have shifted dramatically toward ultra-processed, nutrient-poor, calorie-dense foods packed with sugar, sodium, and additives
Additionally, it's important to note that ultra-processed foods, more generally high in sugars and artificial additives, have also demonstrated concerning associations with increased cancer risk.
Additionally, it's important to note that ultra-processed foods, more generally high in sugars and artificial additives, have also demonstrated concerning associations with increased cancer risk.