We can't find evidence that holds up here. Proponents are reasoning from mechanism or analogy rather than direct human data, and the most credible skeptics raise objections we can't dismiss.
the hands that have this very diverse high alpha diversity microbiome of course it's because they're eating 100 grams of fiber a day but there's no way they're eating 100 grams of fiber a day at least not in the rainy season when we went
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
the Hadza specifically have been held up as a quote plant-based group of hunter-gatherers which is an absurdity if you spend any time with them and they've been purported in these articles by justin sondenberg to eat 150 grams of fiber per day or thereabouts which is inconceivable
I really want to push back on this notion and have some of these anthropologists who are promulgating the notion that the hadza are eating 150 grams of fiber a day on the podcast to say did you actually observe that or are you including all that stuff they spit out in the fiber calculation
you said the hands that eat a clean diet comprised of fiber-rich plants and lean animal meat and then on page 47 you said that the odds are like other hunter-gatherers eat 150 grams of fiber per day so based on my experience this is false and i don't know if you i don't know if you've been to see any of the hunter-gatherer tribes the akung which i want to go visit as well or the hadza but when we ate the tubers stephen we spit out the fiber it was undigested it was unchewable it was the most fibrous thing i've ever eaten