The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
so we've tested this out for 12 plus months with accelerated testing to make sure that there's obviously no microbiology activity there's no bacteria it doesn't spoil it doesn't get rant it doesn't get weird nutrition stays just as high so we have like it tested all the way to 12 months already yeah so we've done accelerated testing of this to show that it doesn't basically doesn't spoil
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
so we've tested this out for 12 plus months with accelerated testing to make sure that there's obviously no microbiology activity there's no bacteria doesn't spoil it doesn't get rany doesn't get weird right nutrition stays just as high so we have like it tested all the way to 12 months already yeah so we've done accelerated testing of this to show that it doesn't basically doesn't spoil yeah