The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
for example two groups of rabbits were fed diets containing either corn oil or coconut oil their backs were saved shaved so sunlight could fall directly onto their skins animals that ate corn oil developed prematurely wrinkled skin while the animals that ate coconut oil didn't show any harm from sun exposure
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.