We can't find evidence that holds up here. Proponents are reasoning from mechanism or analogy rather than direct human data, and the most credible skeptics raise objections we can't dismiss.
basically there were a bunch of problems and yeah he got blown up so — i would say that anything that has his name on it at this point is pretty suspect yeah and the the soup the refilling soup bowls was one of his classic experiments
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
so I I don't I don't know how strong the evidence is that there was actual fabrication I think there may have been some evidence of that