We can't find evidence that holds up here. Proponents are reasoning from mechanism or analogy rather than direct human data, and the most credible skeptics raise objections we can't dismiss.
If you do the calculations eating 8.8 gram of a Celtic Sea salt a salt that I used to eat a lot of you would get 4.87 micrograms of lead per day all of that is just fancy numbers but take that in the context of the fact that the tolerable upper limit for lead in a day is 0.5 micrograms half a microgram
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
Celtic Sea salt has very high levels of all of the heavy metals and I have notes here I'm going to tell you guys what it has so Celtic Sea salt this is technical 171 parts per million in aluminum 82 parts per billion arsenic 1.2 parts per billion in cadmium and 553 parts per billion in lead
in fact Celtic Sea salt had lead that was so high that an average consumption of salt per day around N9 grams of salt you would get almost 10 times the tolerable upper limit for lead in your salt
Celtic Sea salt was full of heavy metals aluminum arsenic cadmium and lead
Celtic Sea Salt. I've used this a lot in my life, but check this out. 2.3 microgram of lead per teaspoon.
The Redmond real salt had6 micrograms of lead over the Prop 65 limit in one single teaspoon of salt.