The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
ABNRF, the nonprofit that I built. We're working on doing some heavy metal testing in water. So I know there's a big deal with Mountain Valley having some arsenic. This is Icelandic watering glass. I know there's Saratoga. We're waiting for heavy metal analysis on the waters and I'll keep you guys posted on that.
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.