The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
for him something like that might work a little bit. It would only work a little until he got sick of it and bored with it and until good marketers were smart and said, "We'll market you things that skirted the definition of ultrarocessed so we could say not an ultrarocessed food, but that still had the same degree of fat, sugar, calories, and whatever."
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.