Paul Saladino· MD
the vegan twins lost more weight than the omnivore twins but if you dig more into what actually happened you see that the researchers provided the vegan twins with less calories
The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
the vegan twins lost more weight than the omnivore twins but if you dig more into what actually happened you see that the researchers provided the vegan twins with less calories
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
the researchers provided the vegan twins with less calories well that will result in more weight loss
If you actually look at what they did, um they don't talk a lot about what they gave the omnivore group. They say it's a healthy omnivore diet, but they didn't really talk about it. And in the paper that they published, they said, "Oh, the study was so great, the vegans lost more weight." Well, if you look at the data, the vegans also ate less calories. They gave the vegans less calories, and then the vegans ate less and then they lost more weight.