The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
remember the tubers and like um the nuts were actually a major source of fiber that sustained humans at around 100 000 years ago and you know we had this you know the second great exodus out of out of africa probably 60 000 years ago and it was always a long oceanfront rivers that's where all humans dispersed it wasn't across plains uh hunting animals
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.