Paul Saladino· MD
saturated fat has clearly been shown to not be harmful in interventional trials (Minnesota, Sydney, etc.) and it raises LDL- yet we continue to believe LDL is the devil?
Loading…
The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
saturated fat has clearly been shown to not be harmful in interventional trials (Minnesota, Sydney, etc.) and it raises LDL- yet we continue to believe LDL is the devil?
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
saturated fat has clearly been shown to not be harmful in interventional trials (Minnesota, Sydney, etc.)
interventional studies in animals clearly saturated fat and tallow what's in fire starter is beneficial so many studies are interventional studies with polyunsaturated fats minnesota coronary sydney diet heart illustrate this clearly