The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
Lending further support to the notion of plants as fallback foods is the nutritional fact that many nutrients are much less bioavailable in plant foods (O3, beta-carotene, b vitamins, minerals due to the presence of phytates oxalates,etc.).
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
the nutrients in vegetables are not very bioavailable you're not going to absorb many of those vitamins and minerals because they are bound to things like phytic acid and oxalic acid oxalates which prevents your body from even utilizing them