The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
clinical benefits of the most abundant polyunsaturated fatty acid omega-6 linoleic acid have not been established in this cohort substituting dietary linoleic acid in place of saturated fats increase the rates of death from all causes coronary heart disease and cardiovascular disease
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
the two best interventional studies are the minnesota coronary experiment and the sydney diet heart study both of these were redone by chris ramsden reevaluation of the traditional diet heart hypothesis analysis of the recovered data from the minnesota coronary experiment