We can't find evidence that holds up here. Proponents are reasoning from mechanism or analogy rather than direct human data, and the most credible skeptics raise objections we can't dismiss.
there are so many multivitam there are so many things in meat that nobody creates a multivitamin for nobody creates a multivitamin of anserine and taurine and carnitine and creatine and peptides and meat that are valuable you just you can't make meat in a vitamin you can't you can't do this
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
so many of the nutrients found in meat are not actually in here obviously because it's fake meat most of you guys know this but don't be misled by myopic nutrition labels they can fake the nutrition label by adding a bunch of synthetic supplements to this by adding a bunch of synthetic vitamins and minerals to make it look like the nutrition label is comparable to beef this is nothing like beef doesn't have any answering doesn't have any taurine doesn't have any choline doesn't have any carnitine doesn't have any coenzyme q10 has zero heme iron it has none of these unique peptides that are found in meat this is not anywhere close to meat don't be fooled if the macros look like meat because even the macro level the protein in this is much less bioavailable than it is in real meat