The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
one of them is the historic study from 1930 where Villa Mar Steffensen and another gentleman were observed very closely at Bellevue Hospital in New York City for an entire year on a fully carnivorous diet and the criticism level that this study is that they didn't know how to measure HSC RP well they didn't in 1930 but they measured a bunch of other stuff that could be a good proxy for that
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.