We can't find evidence that holds up here. Proponents are reasoning from mechanism or analogy rather than direct human data, and the most credible skeptics raise objections we can't dismiss.
and in this article they are going to use a lot of hypothesis to say that things like end nitroso compounds polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons and heterocyclic amines are harmful for humans well if that's the case then why did our ancestors Thrive and if you believe that our ancestors died early you have some research to do and need to understand that infant mortality confounds estimates of life expectancy
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.