Rhonda Patrick· PhD
So if you do chew 20 times or something like Matt was doing, you are gonna eat slower and then 20 minutes go by, and that signal gets to your brain where you're full.
Loading…
The evidence is convergent. Multiple independent sources reach the same conclusion, the underlying mechanism is well-characterized, and even the field's most cautious voices treat it as worth doing.
So if you do chew 20 times or something like Matt was doing, you are gonna eat slower and then 20 minutes go by, and that signal gets to your brain where you're full.
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
if you do chew 20 times or something like Matt was doing, you are gonna eat slower and then 20 minutes go by, and that signal gets to your brain where you're full. So it's like, "Oh," you know, you don't need as much food to get full.
it takes around 20 minutes for the signals, you know, satiety signals to hit your brain and register, "I'm full."
Twenty times before swallowing each bite, and he lost a bunch of weight just by that one change.