Paul Saladino· MD
the amount of glycine is going to vary from 6.26% to 8.57%.
The evidence is convergent. Multiple independent sources reach the same conclusion, the underlying mechanism is well-characterized, and even the field's most cautious voices treat it as worth doing.
the amount of glycine is going to vary from 6.26% to 8.57%.
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
if you look at these analyses from a paper on the amino acid content of beef cuts, you will see chuck flank neck plate rib and rump, the amount of glycine is going to vary from 6.26% to 8.57%. ... methionine levels are lower than glycine levels in the same cuts, chuck, flank, neck, plate, rib, rump. 2.46, 1.88, 2.18, 2.06, 2.27. From 1.88% to 2.46% is the amount of methionine in these cuts.
What we find if we look at beef is that beef actually contains more glycine than methionine even in the muscle meat.
muscle meat is two percent methionine and it's actually seven percent glycine so there's more glycine than methionine in muscle meat